Angel Speak

Let SS be the set of all meaningful sentences. For the sake of argument, let us agree that a meaningful sentence is a sentence that does not defy logic and that is possible.

Statement 1. SS is infinite
The English sentence I have one apple implies that you can have sentences of the form I have xx apple(s), where xx is a natural number (x∈Nx \in \mathbb{N}). Let us denote the set of such sentences claiming the possession of a number of apples as

A={I have x apple(s)∣x∈N}A = \{\text{I have $x$ apple(s)} \mid x\in \mathbb{N} \}

There is no upper bound on xx, so ∣A∣=ℵ0|A|=\aleph_0, and since A⊂SA \subset S, SS is infinite. ■\blacksquare

Statement 2. SS is uncountable (i.e., ∣S∣≥2ℵ0|S|\geq 2^{\aleph_0})
The English sentence I have a one-meter rod, since the length of a rod can be arbitrary, implies that you can have sentences of the form I have an xx-meter-long rod, where xx is a real number. Let us denote the set of such sentences claiming the possession of a rod of arbitrary length (any real number) as

L={I have an x-meter-long rod∣x∈R}L = \{\text{I have an $x$-meter-long rod} \mid x\in \mathbb{R}\}

Then ∣L∣=2ℵ0|L|=2^{\aleph_0}, and since L⊂SL\subset S, ∣S∣≥2ℵ0|S| \geq 2^{\aleph_0}. ■\blacksquare

Examples of elements of LL are sentences like:

I have a 42-meter rod
I have a 2\sqrt{2}-meter rod
I have a π\pi-meter rod
I have a googol-meter rod

[Work in progress]